Galileo AI Pricing
Galileo AI's Pro tier says pricing 'scales based on number of traces.' It never says by how much.
Galileo's real numbers, verified straight from its own pricing page: Free is $0 a month for 5,000 traces with unlimited users, Pro is $100 a month billed yearly (roughly $150 billed monthly, per independent pricing coverage) for 50,000 traces, and Enterprise has no published price at all. This page verifies every figure, works out what the yearly-versus-monthly gap actually means in dollars, and covers the one question Galileo's own pricing page leaves open: what happens the month a workspace clears 50,000 traces, and what your own customer never sees no matter which tier you're on.
Verified against Galileo's own pricing page
What Galileo AI actually costs
Galileo's pricing runs three tiers, and every figure below comes from Galileo's own current pricing page. Free costs $0 a month and covers 5,000 traces, with unlimited users and unlimited custom evaluations included from the start, a generous seat policy for a free tier in this category. The page states this plan is aimed at developers and small teams who want to experiment and iterate, and it doesn't publish a data retention window for it anywhere.
Pro costs $100 a month when billed yearly, with Galileo's own page stating that price reflects a 33% saving over paying monthly. It covers 50,000 traces a month, a tenfold jump over Free, and adds standard role-based access control, advanced analytics, and Slack-based dedicated support on top of everything in Free. Enterprise has no dollar figure published anywhere on Galileo's site, quoted only through a sales conversation, and covers unlimited traces, custom rate limits, hosted, VPC, or on-premise deployment, enterprise-grade RBAC with SSO, a dedicated customer success manager, real-time guardrails, 24/7 support across Slack, email, and phone, low-latency dedicated inference servers, and forward-deployed engineering support.
Three tiers, one meter
The three Galileo tiers, in plain numbers
Straight from Galileo's own pricing page, not a third party estimate.
Free: $0 a month
5,000 traces, unlimited users, unlimited custom evaluations. No retention window is stated for this tier anywhere on the page.
Pro: $100 a month, billed yearly
50,000 traces, standard RBAC, advanced analytics, Slack-based dedicated support. Galileo states a 33% saving applies for paying yearly instead of monthly.
Enterprise: custom pricing
No published number. Unlimited traces, custom rate limits, VPC or on-premise hosting, SSO, a dedicated CSM, and real-time guardrails.
The number the Pro tier never publishes
What actually happens past 50,000 traces a month?
Galileo's Pro tier includes 50,000 traces a month, and the page states that price plainly. What it doesn't state is what happens on trace 50,001. The only language addressing it, anywhere on Galileo's pricing page, is that "pricing scales based on number of traces," a sentence with no per-trace rate, no billed block size, and no stated ceiling attached to it. Compare that with the two other pricing pages in this same category that this site has already verified: Portkey publishes $9 per additional 100,000 recorded logs, in writing, up to a stated 3 million ceiling, and Langfuse publishes a specific per-unit overage rate on its own paid tiers too, a plain number Galileo's own page publishes nowhere.
That gap matters most for exactly the teams this category serves. A workload that clears 50,000 traces in a busy month, a support agent handling a seasonal spike, a sales assistant onboarding a new set of accounts, has no public number to check before the month closes. The only way to learn the real figure is to go over the line and read the resulting invoice, or open a sales conversation before that happens. Budget a buffer under 50,000 traces if avoiding that conversation matters, since Galileo's own page gives no other way to plan around it.
Where the real jump sits
Pro and Enterprise aren't a small step apart
Three things confirmed on Galileo's own tier breakdown that Pro doesn't include and Enterprise does.
No SSO or on-prem hosting on Pro
Single sign-on, VPC hosting, and on-premise deployment are all Enterprise-only. Pro runs on Galileo's own hosted infrastructure with standard RBAC, not the security posture a team fielding an enterprise buyer's questionnaire usually needs.
Real-time guardrails stay behind the same wall
Pro's advanced analytics score what already happened. Turning that scoring into a live guardrail that intervenes on a response before it reaches a user is an Enterprise feature, alongside a dedicated customer success manager and forward-deployed engineering support.
What the meter doesn't show
Galileo's traces tell your team how the agent scored. They tell your customer nothing
Every number on Galileo's pricing page, the trace count climbing toward 5,000 or 50,000, an evaluation score on a heatmap, a real-time guardrail flag on a caught response, describes how your agent performed and what it cost your own team to evaluate it. Unlimited users on Free and RBAC on the paid tiers both decide who on your own team can see that same workspace; neither adds a second, scoped view for a customer sitting outside your company, and nothing in Galileo's own tier breakdown, Free through Enterprise, mentions isolating a result to one specific end customer. Even Enterprise's VPC and on-premise hosting changes where the evaluation runs without changing who the dashboard was built for.
If you sell an AI agent inside a product other companies pay for, that gap surfaces the moment a customer asks what the agent actually did for their account this month, a question no trace count or evaluation score answers on its own. AiAgRe's Node SDK reads the same kind of agent events Galileo already evaluates, through the same LangChain, LlamaIndex, or CrewAI integrations, and tags each one with an organization identity and a customer identity at the point of ingestion. That turns into white-labeled dashboard components your customer sees inside your own product, scoped so tightly that one customer's numbers never reach another customer's view. It doesn't replace Galileo's own evaluation scoring or its guardrails, and most teams run both: Galileo for how the agent scored, AiAgRe for what that same activity was worth to the person paying for it.
When a trace count stops being the real question
Three questions Galileo's pricing page was never built to answer
None of these show up in a trace count, an evaluation score, or a guardrail flag. All three show up once real customers start asking.
Your customer asks what their account got, not how the agent scored
A customer deciding whether to renew wants their own deflection rate and cost per resolution, scoped to their own traffic, not a walkthrough of an evaluation workspace they can't log into. A clean guardrail record reassures your engineers; it says nothing to the person deciding whether to keep paying.
Unlimited users for your team, zero seats for theirs
Free skips a seat cap entirely and Pro adds RBAC on top of it, but neither adds a scoped view for a customer outside your company, because Galileo's workspace model was built for your own engineers, not for a second tenant layer underneath them.
The trace count tracks volume. Nothing tracks value
An undefined "pricing scales based on number of traces" line answers what a growing workload might cost, eventually. It says nothing about what that traffic was worth, the same gap a fuller look at AI agent monitoring tools as a category runs into past Galileo alone.
FAQs
Galileo AI pricing: frequently asked questions
Common questions from teams pricing Galileo against their own trace volume before they commit to a tier, or before they add a second layer on top.
How much does Galileo AI actually cost?
Three tiers, verified straight from Galileo's own pricing page. Free costs $0 a month, covers 5,000 traces, and includes unlimited users and unlimited custom evaluations, though the page never states a data retention window for that tier. Pro costs $100 a month billed yearly, a 33% discount Galileo states outright, and covers 50,000 traces a month plus standard role-based access control, advanced analytics, and Slack-based dedicated support. Enterprise has no published number, quoted only through a sales conversation, and covers unlimited traces, custom rate limits, hosted or VPC or on-premise deployment, enterprise RBAC with SSO, a dedicated customer success manager, real-time guardrails, 24/7 support, low-latency dedicated inference servers, and forward-deployed engineering support.
What happens once a Pro workspace goes over its 50,000 trace allowance?
Galileo's own pricing page never says. The only line addressing it states that "pricing scales based on number of traces," with no per-trace rate, no billed block size, and no ceiling published anywhere on the page itself. That is a real gap next to Portkey's pricing page, which states its overage rate down to the dollar per 100,000 logs, or Langfuse's pricing page, which publishes a per-unit rate past its included allowance. A team budgeting against Galileo's Pro tier has no public number to run the math against once traffic clears 50,000 traces a month; the only way to learn the real figure is to go over the line and see what the next invoice says, or ask sales before that happens.
Is Galileo Pro really $100 a month, or $150?
Both figures are real, and they describe two different billing choices Galileo's own page only partly spells out. The page states Pro costs $100 a month with a 33% discount applied for paying yearly, which confirms a yearly commitment is priced lower, but it never prints the monthly-billed number outright. Working the discount backward, a 33% saving off a $100 effective monthly rate lands close to $150, and that figure is exactly what independent pricing coverage of Galileo states as the monthly-billed price. Treat $100 a month as the confirmed yearly rate straight from Galileo's own page, and $150 a month as a well-supported but third-party figure for anyone who wants to pay monthly instead.
What's included on the free plan, and where does it actually stop?
Unlimited users and unlimited custom evaluations, both included at $0, which is generous next to tools in this category that cap free-tier seats. The number that stops a growing team is the trace count: 5,000 traces a month, with no retention window stated anywhere on Galileo's pricing page for that tier. A five-person team running a moderately active agent through evaluation and monitoring can clear 5,000 traces well before running into any seat limit, since Free never caps how many people can log in, only how much the account can trace before the count resets the following month.
What's the real gap between Pro and Enterprise?
Three things Pro doesn't have that Enterprise does, all confirmed on Galileo's own tier breakdown: single sign-on, real-time guardrails that turn an evaluation into an operational safeguard rather than an offline score, and any deployment option besides Galileo's own hosted infrastructure, since VPC and on-premise hosting are both Enterprise-only. Pro adds standard role-based access control over Free, but the harder access and security controls, along with a dedicated customer success manager and forward-deployed engineering support, all sit behind the same custom-priced conversation as unlimited traces. A team that has outgrown 50,000 traces a month is usually also the team that has started asking security questions Pro's standard RBAC alone doesn't answer.
How does Galileo compare to Langfuse, Arize, or Braintrust on price?
On sticker price alone, Galileo's $100-a-month Pro tier sits between Langfuse's $29-a-month Core plan and Braintrust's $249-a-month Pro tier, and above Arize's $50-a-month AX Pro plan. All four price against a different unit though: Galileo and Arize both meter traces or spans, Langfuse meters observations, and Braintrust meters a combination of data volume and evaluation scores, so a dollar-for-dollar comparison undercounts what each plan actually measures. The fuller side-by-side view, including where Datadog and PromptLayer fit into the same category, lives on the AI agent monitoring tools comparison.
Does any Galileo plan show pricing or ROI data to my own customers, and can I run AiAgRe alongside it?
No plan does, Free through Enterprise, and yes, running both is the normal setup rather than a workaround. Every number Galileo's dashboard renders, the trace count climbing toward a plan's allowance, an evaluation score on a scorecard, a real-time guardrail flag, lives inside a workspace built for the team that pays Galileo's own bill. Unlimited users on the Free tier, and standard or enterprise RBAC on the paid tiers, both govern who inside your company can see that workspace; neither adds a second, scoped view for a customer sitting outside it, and nothing in Galileo's own tier breakdown mentions isolating a result to one specific end customer. AiAgRe's Node SDK reads the same kind of underlying agent events Galileo already evaluates, through the same LangChain, LlamaIndex, or CrewAI integrations, and tags each one with an organization identity and a customer identity at the point of ingestion. That turns into white-labeled dashboard components your own customer sees inside your product, showing deflection rate and cost per resolution scoped so tightly that one customer's numbers never reach another's view. Installing it doesn't touch how Galileo scores an evaluation or counts a trace; the two SDKs read the same agent, one billed and displayed to your team, the other billed and displayed to the customer paying for it.
Already evaluating every trace through Galileo? Now show your customer what it did.
Request access and we'll walk through how AiAgRe's embed tokens map onto the trace data Galileo's evaluations already produce.